Rebuff from Judiciary!

Never before any state govt have ever got so many strictures from courts of law in India like Mamta Banerjee's govt.Not a single day passes without her govt getting dressing down from judges at court..It all started from Singur Act which High court declared unconstitutional.It hurt Mamata's pride so much so that she didn't even hesitate to say judgement can be purchased by money.However, with passage of time Mamata got accustomed to anti-govt verdicts from court.But why do court verdicts go against govt again and again?Is it the fault of her legal cell or more precisely the incompetence of the legal experts whom she's engaged to fight the legal battle against her govt?Perhaps not.Most probably she does not care to listen to the advice of her legal experts or her lawyers do not dare convince her that her administrative decisions would not stand legal scrutiny.It's her ego that blocks her power of reasoning.In fact,driven by sheer egoistic attitude she has unnecessarily driven the holding of Panchayet polls to supreme court where she badly suffered the loss of face, although her law minister claims it was the victory of the govt as it was SEC who appealed to supreme court for postponement of polls.Even a man in the street knows the boot is on the other leg and so law minister's claim is simply a comic relief or a foolish and most dishonest attempt to confuse people deliberately. Mamata initially desired Panchayet polls be one day match so that in absence of adequate security forces TMC would sweep the polls by sheer muscle power.Thanks to SEC, it did not succumb to pressure.Again, in Kamduni rape-murder case CID drew flak from all quarters and was severely reprimanded at lower and higher courts for submitting partial and faulty charge sheet without even forensic report.Perhaps, CID did it to satisfy Mamata who promised at Kamduni charge sheet would be submitted with in 15 days but justice hurried is justice buried.Such instance helps people lose faith in CID and make it a laughing stock to public also.More than two years have gone by and no body knows how many legal set-backs are in store for Mamata in the remaining years of her rule.